Legal Opinion
United States v. Florea
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 17, 1945No. Civil Action 1421PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES ALGER FEE, District Judge.
This is an action for condemnation of certain real property embraced within the limits of the Multnomah County Drainage District. The United States has specified in the complaint that the interest taken is the fee simple title. The answer of the defendant District contains the allegations hereinafter set forth in condensed form.
It is alleged that the defendant, Multno-mah County Drainage District, is a municipal or public corporation, organized in order to reclaim swamp and overflowed lands within its territorial limits. Within its boundaries, under the law,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boston Chamber of Commerce v. City of BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Neponsit Property Owners' Ass'n v. Emigrant Industrial Savings BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Simmons v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Brooklyn Eastern Dist. Terminal v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- State v. Human Relations Research FoundationWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- United States v. AhoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1944
- United States Steel Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.