Legal Opinion
United States v. 129.4 Acres of Land
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided May 26, 1976No. CIV 75-166 PHX-CAMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this court, having received and considered defendant Yuma Mesa Irrigation And Drainage District’s (hereinafter referred to as the “District”) Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and/or Motion for Summary Judgment filed with this Court December 29, 1975; and having received and considered Plaintiff United States of America’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed with this Court on February 11, 1976; and this Court having received and considered all other memoranda submitted by the parties, finds that there are no genuine…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. FloreaDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
- United States v. AhoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1944
- Columbia Irrigation District, a Corporation v. United States of America, State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. 129.4 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of Yuma, State of Arizona, and Fred W. Kamrath, and Unknown OwnersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- City of Chicago v. PrologisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- United States v. 129.4 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- City of Chicago v. PrologisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- United States v. 129.4 Acres Of Land In Yuma County, Arizona, Fred W..Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986