Hays v. Windsor
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County and from an order denying a new trial. F. T. Nilón, •Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiff brings the action to recover the possession of certain grain of which he alleges ownership and right of possession. The cause was tried by the court without a jury and defendants had judgment, from which and from the order denying a new trial plaintiff appeals.
It was alleged in the separate answers of the defendants that defendant Ewell Windsor and Stirling P. Windsor, his brother, deceased husband of defendant Alice Windsor, were copartners and tenants of plaintiff under a farming lease for the cropping season 1895-96, whereby plaintiff was to receive one-half of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brooks v. ForingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Miller v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murphy v. MulgrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Greenbaum v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- McDonald v. McConkeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Davis v. Air Technical Industries, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.