Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Forington

California Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1897No. L. A. No. 125PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.

Action to foreclose a mortgage, in which defendant suffered default. The mortgage provided that, in the event of foreclosure, the mortgagee might retain from the proceeds of sale the costs and charges of suit, “ including counsel fees at the rate of -per cent.” The prayer aslced for the principal and interest due, “ and for costs of suit,” the sale of the mortgaged premises and application of proceeds in payment of the amount due, and for general relief; but it did not in terms ask an award of counsel fees. The court in its decree, however, made plaintiff an allowance for counsel fees in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prescott v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Raun v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  3. Parrott v. DenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. O'Neal v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Gautier v. EnglishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Foley v. FoleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Genis v. KrasneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API