Legal Opinion

State v. Thirty-Six (36) Pinball MacHines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1977No. 48,370PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This action was brought in the name of the state of Kansas upon the relation of the district attorney under K.S.A. 22-3901, et seq., to abate thirty-six (36) pinball machines as common nuisances alleging they had been possessed and used as gambling devices and should be destroyed. The District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas, ordered thirty-one (31) of the thirty-six (36) machines returned to the owners. The order was based largely on failure of the state to prove that the owners of the machines had knowledge that the machines were being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Van Oster v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  4. State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming TableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Grigsby v. MitchumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Director of Fin., Pr. Geo's Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Kidwell v. U. S. Marketing, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. DurstSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Games Management, Inc. v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. Kidwell v. US Marketing, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API