Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Kidwell v. U. S. Marketing, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1981No. Nos. 12867 and 12910PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Chief Justice.
The state commenced this action against two Garden City adult bookstores under the provisions of the Idaho Moral Nuisance Abatement Act. I.C. §§ 52-401, et seq. Named as defendants were two business entities, U. S. Marketing, Inc., and Niks & Naks Adult Bookstore; their managers, owners, officers and incorporators; and *453those individuals who owned the two parcels of property upon which the bookstores were located.
The state sought to have some of defendants’ films and publications declared obscene. The state asked for injunctive relief abating the alleged nuisance; a…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- DeWils Interiors, Inc. v. DinesIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
- Powers v. Canyon CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Paducah v. Investment Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Hackett v. StreeterIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.