Legal Opinion

Grigsby v. Mitchum

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1963No. 43,179PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action challenging the constitutional validity of a municipal ordinance of Kansas City, Kansas, requiring a license for the operation of pinball machines. The trial court held the ordinance unconstitutional, and appeal has been duly perfected by the city.

The plaintiffs (appellees) operate small businesses varying in type within the confines of the city of Kansas City, Kansas. Most of them have coin-operated amusement devices known as pinball games located in or on the premises where they conduct their business. Their regular…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  3. State v. One Bally Coney Island No. 21011 Gaming TableSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Terry v. CITY OF PORTLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Julian v. Golden Rule Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tri-State Hotel Co. v. LonderholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Stephan v. LaneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Londerholm v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Blue Star Supper Club, Inc. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. City of Lyons v. SuttleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API