Legal Opinion
Jacobson v. Comcast Corp.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 28, 2010No. 1:09-cr-00562PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, a group of cable technicians, have brought suit seeking overtime wage payments under the Fair Labor Standard Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq., against Comcast, and companies that con tracted with Comcast to install cable services for Comcast customers (Futuretek, Procom, and Conn-X) (collectively “Installation Companies”). There is no dispute that the Installation Companies employ Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs contend further that Comcast is their joint employer within the meaning of the FLSA.
Comcast has filed a motion for summary judgment.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Rutherford Food Corp. v. McCombSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Schultz v. Capital International Security, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Martin v. Sprint United Management Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Roman v. Guapos III, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Jean-Louis v. Metropolitan Cable Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Miles v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Andro Tolentino v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc., Westin Hotel Management, LPSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.