Legal Opinion

Naponiello v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 14, 1923No. 3048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs in error were convicted of having committed offenses against the United States. By motions for directed verdict and in arrest of judgment they raised the issue that the facts presented and proved were not in violation of any national statute.

All the counts except the last charged that defendants in violation of section 215 of the Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10385), used the mails to promote a “scheme to defraud” by sending “black-hand letters,” which conveyed “threats to each of said persons that, unless he would deliver to defendants a large sum of money,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  2. Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  3. Foster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  4. Horman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Grey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. James Scott PendergraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1942
  4. Norton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
  5. United States v. ZalewskiDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API