Legal Opinion
United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 9, 1942No. 15782PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWEENEY, District Judge.
Six of the defendants have filed demurrers to the indictment, and pleas of the statute of limitations with reference to Counts 1 to 9 and Count 40. These defendants are Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter & Gamble Distributing Company, The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company, Raymond J. Lamping, D. Paul Smelser, and Cleo W. Knappenberger. In addition the defendant Smelser has filed a plea in abatement, a motion to inspect and obtain a copy of the grand jury minutes, a motion that the court inspect the grand jury minutes, and a motion to quash the indictment.
I. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Shushan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Commonwealth v. O'BrienMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Mulloney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Jerry R. BohonusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Andrew GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Earl BushCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Isaac States, United States of America v. Michael McCoy United States of America v. Robert MorganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.