Norton v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of using the mails to defraud. Criminal Code § 215 (18 U.S.C.A. § 338).
The appeal presents the question of the sufficiency of the indictment to state an offense under the statute. The sufficiency of the evidence is also challenged, but the latter point need not be determined.
For a proper understanding of the problem presented to this court it is essential to review the allegations of the indictment.
It is charged .that the appellant, Violet Wells Norton (and certain other parties who were later dismissed), devised “a scheme and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. EatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Fasulo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Donnelley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Horman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. James Scott PendergraftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- James Wade Braswell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Muench v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
- Hudspeth v. MelvilleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. WhitmoreDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.