Legal Opinion
Horman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 3, 1902No. 1,066PublishedCited by 42 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
DAY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error was indicted and convicted in the district court for a violation of section 5480 of the Revised Statutes of the United States, as amended March 2, 1889 (25 Stat. 873). Omitting provisions which are not necessary to the disposition of the pending case, this section reads as follows;
“If any person having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud to be effected by either opening or intending to open correspondence or communication with any person, whether resident within or outside the United States, by means of the post office…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Stokes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Weeber v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1894
- United States v. JonesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1882
- Milby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Hammerschmidt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Armand P. D'AmAtoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Regent Office Supply Co., Inc., and Oxford Office Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Isaac States, United States of America v. Michael McCoy United States of America v. Robert MorganCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Ralph M. Daniel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.