Legal Opinion

United States v. James Scott Pendergraft

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 16, 2002No. 01-13057PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COX, Circuit Judge:

James Scott Pendergraft and Michael Spielvogel were convicted, following a jury trial, for (1) attempted extortion, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, (2) mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and (3) conspiracy to commit extortion, mail fraud, and perjury, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Spielvogel was also convicted of filing a false affidavit, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623, and making a false statement to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Pendergraft and Spielvogel appeal, challenging their convictions and…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Meredith T. Raney, Jr. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  3. Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API