Legal Opinion

Northern Assurance Co. v. Stout

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 1911No. Civ. No. 770PublishedCited by 17 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Cramer Meat and Packing Company, from the judgment, on the judgment-roll alone.

The complaint was filed by plaintiff to compel the defendants above named to interplead their alleged respective rights to the sum of $400, which was due from plaintiff on a policy of insurance issued by it to the defendant, Martha Stout, and underwritten on a building erected by her on a certain lot situated in Hamilton City, Glenn county, said building having been, after the issuance of said policy, destroyed by fire.

The facts, as adopted from the findings of the court, are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davenport v. TurpinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Borland v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Simons v. BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. McCann v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. McAdams v. FelknerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. DeysherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hunter v. SchultzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Keeler v. McNeirSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Brooks v. BlackColorado Court of Appeals · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API