Legal Opinion

McAdams v. Felkner

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1903No. S.F. No. 2658PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an action in ejectment; judgment went for plaintiff, and from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial defendants appeal.

The title to the premises in question is in plaintiff, it having been conveyed to him before the commencement of thisaetion by H. G. Offield and his wife, Linnie J. Offield, the-latter being then the owner of the legal title. The defendants set up as a defense that they were rightfully in possession, under a written contract made by defendant 0. 0. Felkner with the said Offields to purchase the premises, a copy of the contract being…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alder v. DrudisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Northern Assurance Co. v. StoutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  3. Hall v. RempCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API