Borland v. Lewis
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, County of San Joaquin. The defendant had judgment in the Court below. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Rhodes, J.:
Ejectment to recover a parcel of swamp and overflowed land. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment. It appears from the findings that the plaintiff purchased the land in 1855; that in 1856 he paid one year’s interest and received a certificate of purchase; that he made no further payment until 1865, when he paid all the interest which had accrued, except for two years, which the Legislature had remitted. The plaintiff never had the possession of the premises in controversy. Traverse, the defendant’s grantor, made application to purchase the land January 4th, 1858;…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Kaiser Land and Fruit Co. v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Oakland Railroad v. Oakland, Brooklyn, & Fruit Vale RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Northern Assurance Co. v. StoutCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Santa Rosa City R. Co. v. Central St. Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Upham v. HoskingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.