Legal Opinion

Alley v. Daniel

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 6, 1929No. 12777PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabeer.

At its 1929 session, the Legislature passed an Act (36 St. at Targe, page 992), the title of which reads as follows: “An Act to Create and Establish a Sewer District in Spar-tanburg County to be known as ‘Spartanburg Metropolitan District,’ and to Define its Powers and Authority, and to Provided for the Government Thereof, and for the Issuance of Bonds to Provide Funds for Constructing and Establishing a System or Systems of Sewer and Sewerage Disposal for the Protection of Health in said District and the Establishment and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  2. Briggs v. Greenville CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Riley v. Charleston Union Station Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1905
  4. McKiever v. City of SumterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  5. State v. O'DaySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Keyserling v. BeasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Mills Mill v. HawkinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Sloan Ex Rel. Resident, Taxpayer & Registered Elector v. Wilkins Ex Rel. S.C. House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  4. DANTZLER v. CallisonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  5. Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. SeigniousDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API