Legal Opinion
DANTZLER v. Callison
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided August 20, 1956No. 17200PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
T. B. Greneker, Acting Associate Justice.
This action was brought in the original jurisdiction of this Court, and as the pleadings will be printed, we only state very briefly the allegations thereof.
The plaintiffs allege that the individual plaintiffs are all licensed naturopathic physicians and were admitted to practice in compliance with the law prior to June, 1946, and that the last ten practitioners admitted in the State were admitted under the amended act of 1949. During the 1956 Session of the General Assembly of South Carolina, the following act was adopted:
“Section 1. Sections 56-901…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Allopathic State Board of Medical Examiners v. FowlerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Sloan v. South Carolina Board of Physical Therapy ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Dunton v. South Carolina Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- Alva Owen Hawkins v. Honorable Joseph R. Moss, Chief JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
- Jerry R. England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.