Legal Opinion

Briggs v. Greenville County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 18, 1926No. 12083PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an application by a taxpayer of Greenville County to the Supreme Court in its original jurisdiction to restrain the respondents from entering into so-called reimbursement agreements with the State Highway Commission of South Carolina, and from issuing bonds of Greenville County or of the Road District of Greenville County, and to have the statutes authorizing these agreements and bond issues declared unconstitutional.

The respondents are Greenville County, the Road District of Greenville County, and the Supervisor of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Sonneborn Brothers v. CuretonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Winston v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Lillard v. MeltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915
  4. Shields v. City of LovelandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  5. Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Ashmore v. Greater Greenville Sewer Dist.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Clarke v. South Carolina Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  5. State Ex Rel. Richards v. MoorerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API