Legal Opinion

Keyserling v. Beasley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 22, 1996No. 24415PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Waller, Justice:

We accepted this matter is our original jurisdiction, not to decide whether the Barnwell landfill should remain open or should close, but solely to determine whether sections B & D of Part II, section 79 of the 1995 Appropriations Act violate Article III, § 17 of the South Carolina Constitution. We hold that they do not.

FACTS

The Southeastern Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Compact (Southeastern Compact) was adopted by the General Assembly in 1982. It was intended to address the problem of disposal of low-level radioactive waste on a regional basis. S.C. Code Ann. §…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hercules Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. State Ex Rel. Roddey v. BYRNES, GOVERNORSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. McCollum v. SnipesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Deloach v. ScheperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  2. Sloan Ex Rel. Resident, Taxpayer & Registered Elector v. Wilkins Ex Rel. S.C. House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
  3. State v. Corey D.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Key Corporate Capital, Inc. v. County of BeaufortSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Father v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API