Legal Opinion

Fox & Co. v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1932No. 22959. Department TwoPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This appeal grows out of two cases consolidated for trial and appeal.

On about July 25, 1929, the state let a highway contract to certain contractors by the name of Von der Hellen & Pierson, who subcontracted the clearing and grading to Frank Fox. Von der Hellen & Pierson and Fox then subcontracted the clearing and burning on the right of way to George Karsel and seventeen or eighteen others, who constituted a co-partnership for the purpose of doing the work of clearing and burning-on the right of way.

After tliey had completed the work, Karsel et al., had a dispute with Fox as to its…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burchett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Nettleship v. ShipmanWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Machenheimer v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wilson v. Times Printing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Swam v. Aetna Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haller v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hubbard v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Calvin v. West Coast Power Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1942
  4. Lindbloom v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Erickson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API