Legal Opinion

Haller v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1942No. 28610PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court affirming an order of the joint board of the department of labor and industries rejecting a workman’s industrial insurance claim. The material facts, which are not in dispute, were concisely and accurately stated by the court in its memorandum opinion as follows:

“William Canady is the owner of Delano Townsite and as such, operates his own water system. Two or three weeks prior to July 22, 1939, he decided to have a well cleaned out. His son Jess recommended the plaintiff [appellant], who had been working on the dam but who was out of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norman v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Pittsburgh Iron & Steel Foundries Co. v. Seaman-Sleeth Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Hammerschmith v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Fox & Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Vance v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lloyd's of Yakima Floor Center v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. White v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Clausen v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Department of Labor & Industries v. Lyons Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API