Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1925PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVaeseR, J.

The defendant’s exceptions challenge instruction given to the jury in the county court as follows: “The principal is held to be liable on contracts duly made by his agent with a third person (1) when the agent acts within the scope of his actual authority; (2) when the contract, although unwise, has been ratified; (3) when the agent acts within the scope of his apparent authority, unless the third person has notice that the agent is exceeding his authority, the term “apparent authority,” including the power to do whatever is usually done and' necessary to be done, in order to carry into…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. Wynn v. GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Bank v. Hay.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Biggs v. Insurance Co. (North Carolina Home)Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Bank of New Hanover v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Hill v. . YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Grier v. . WeldonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Greene v. . GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Brown v. . DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API