Legal Opinion
R. R. v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided April 15, 1908PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A jury trial having been formally waived by the parties, the court heard the testimony and found the facts as follows:
1. The plaintiff is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of North Carolina.
2. The defendant is a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of North Carolina.
3. On 1 September, 1904, the plaintiff made, duly executed, and delivered a lease to the Howland improvement Company. A copy of said lease is hereto annexed and made a part of these findings of fact.
4. The defendant succeeded to the rights and liabilities of the said Howland Improvement…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Devlin v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Boston Ice Co. v. PotterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Rochester Lantern Co. v. Stiles & Parker Press Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Mayor of New York v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Casket Co. v. . WheelerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Gulf States Creosoting Co. v. LovingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
- Corvallis & Alsea River R. v. Portland E. & E. Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.