Legal Opinion

Grier v. . Weldon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The plaintiff objected and assigned error to the submission of the issues and tendered other issues. We think that the issues as submitted arise on the pleadings and present to the jury inquiries as to all the essential matters or determinative facts in dispute.

In Hooper v. Trust Co., 190 N. C., 423 (428), speaking to the subject, we find: “The test of the sufficiency of issues is, 'did the issues afford the parties opportunity to introduce all pertinent evidence and apply it fairly?’ Tuttle v. Tuttle, 146 N. C., 484; Deloache v. Deloache, 189 N. C., 394, 400; Elliott v. Power Co., ante, 62.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Exum v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Leaksville-Spray Institute v. MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Cherokee County v. . MeroneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Tuttle v. TuttleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. DeLoache v. DeLoacheSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Evans v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Wilson v. Inter-Ocean Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. Grubb v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  4. Gasque v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Steele v. . CoxeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API