Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. Allen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SHARP, Justice.
In the light of the petition to rehear, the Court has reconsidered the record and reviewed all briefs which have been filed. The question which we re-examine is the sufficiency of the evidence to withstand defendant Allen’s motions, made in accordance with G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50, for a directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
At the outset we note that at the same time plaintiffs filed this action against defendant Allen they also filed a separate suit against her alleged agent, Dr. Charles S. Norburn, to recover from him the cost of the grading which they had…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- GENERAL AIR CONDITIONING COMPANY v. DouglassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Adler v. Lumber Mutual Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Bryant v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Penley v. PenleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- O'Grady v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Smith v. PriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.