Legal Opinion

Brown v. . Daniel

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The purpose of the trial is to determine the controversy between the parties in accordance with the law. Issues are raised by the pleadings, but in' their formulation they must have regard not only to the pleadings but to the phases of the evidence pertinent thereto. Elliott v. Power Co., 190 N. C., 62, 128 S. E., 730; Martin v. Knight, 147 N. C., 564, 61 S. E., 477. Where the issues submitted to the jury are not determinative of the controversy, a judgment entered thereupon is erroneous. Bank v. Broom Co., 188 N. C., 508, 125 S. E., 12.

In applying these principles we must bear in mind that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hand v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  2. Martin v. . KnightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Teseneer v. Henrietta Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Elliott v. Tallassee Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Merchants National Bank v. Carolina Broom Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crouse v. VernonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Rental Towel & Uniform Service v. Bynum International, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Stewart v. McDadeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Anderson v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Carroll v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API