Hankinson v. State

HILL, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant, Anthony Hankinson (Hankinson), was convicted of conspiracy 1 to commit aggravated assault and battery. 2 He submits this appeal contending that there is not sufficient evidence to sustain the convietion. We will affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 2] The only issue presented for our review is whether or not sufficient evidence is present to sustain Hankinson's conviction, although it is couched in terms of possible abuse of discretion by the district court in denying his motion for judgment of aequit-tal, 3 which was made after all evidence had been received, including Hankinson's…