Legal Opinion

Dice v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1992No. 91-43PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

URBIGKIT, Chief Justice.

Appellant Max Dice was caught in the act during a nighttime bar burglary and appeals from his conviction. Dice contends the trial court erred in denying a requested intoxication instruction, in allowing prose-cutorial misconduct and in the improper introduction of his confession and other evidence.

We find no reversible error and affirm the conviction.

I. STATED ISSUES

Max Dice, for reversal of his burglary conviction, asks:

I. Whether the trial court erred in refusing appellant’s requested Instruction “A” which set forth in one instruction that the burden of proof was…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. United States v. Herman PadillaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. People v. PecoraroIllinois Supreme Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. FauciSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. Gleason v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Schreibvogel v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Burton v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mazurek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API