Jasch v. State

RAPER, Justice.

The defendant-appellant was found guilty by a jury of a controlled substance (marijuana) delivery in violation of § 35-347.31(a)(ii), W.S.1957, Cum.Supp., and sentenced.1 His appeal raises two issues: (1) He was prejudicially joined for trial with a codefendant Jevne, and (2) A statement made by codefendant implicating defendant was constitutionally inadmissible. We will affirm.

Codefendant Jevne was joined over the timely objection of defendant. At the trial, the evidence disclosed that Ted Moore, a volunteer deputy sheriff, while working part-time evenings as an undercover…