Legal Opinion

Ekholm v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 2004No. 03-130PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[T1] The appellant, Lawrence Ekholm, appeals his felony conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine, with the intent to deliver. On appeal, Mr. Ekholim claims that the evidence admitted at trial was insufficient to sustain that conviction. We find that the evidence was sufficient, and affirm.

ISSUE

[12] The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the record contains sufficient evidence to sustain the appellant's conviction for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine, with the intent to deliver.

FACTS

[13] Maria Hair (Hair) met the appellant through Krista Johnson…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. RabinowichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dallas Clem Mitchell v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Garay v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Leyo v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Jones v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Garriott v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API