Architectural Manufacturing Co. v. Airotec, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. Construing the evidence as we must against the motion for directed verdict the following must be considered. In the opinion of Biron, what Airolite wanted was an organization that could compete with its main competitor in the already established louver and manufacturing field, which competitor had an architectural specialties division, which Airolite lacked. In April before Scott and Biron left in May, Scott had a list for his use showing all job bids by AMCOA which totaled over $10,000. He admitted that such a list would contain information helpful to a competitor, and,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Morgan's Home Equipment Corp. v. MartucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Taylor Freezer Sales Co. v. Sweden Freezer Eastern Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- E. D. Lacey Mills, Inc. v. KeithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Arford v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- Hayes v. IrwinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
- DP-Tek, Inc. v. AT & T Global Information Solutions Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Preferred Risk Insurance v. BoykinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.