Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
Injunction. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court.' December 2, 1904. Plaintiff not entitled to complain of rules and agreements to which it was a party: 18 N. J. L. 87; 9 N. Y. S. 529; 60 Tex. 438; 170 N. Y. 321; 58 Hun, 393; 120 Ga. 597. In pari delicto: 11 Paige, 349; 1 McLean, 460; 101 Mass. 363; 1 Chand. 207; 8 L. R. A. 469; 2 Hill, 517; 1 East, 96; 8 T. R. 575; 79 U. S. 349; 10 Me. 71; 14 N. Y. 94; 57 N. Y. 518; 20 Wend. 24; 6 Cow. 431; 38 Fed. 191; 83 Ala. 146;…
Read the full summary
Injunction. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court.' December 2, 1904. Plaintiff not entitled to complain of rules and agreements to which it was a party: 18 N. J. L. 87; 9 N. Y. S. 529; 60 Tex. 438; 170 N. Y. 321; 58 Hun, 393; 120 Ga. 597. In pari delicto: 11 Paige, 349; 1 McLean, 460; 101 Mass. 363; 1 Chand. 207; 8 L. R. A. 469; 2 Hill, 517; 1 East, 96; 8 T. R. 575; 79 U. S. 349; 10 Me. 71; 14 N. Y. 94; 57 N. Y. 518; 20 Wend. 24; 6 Cow. 431; 38 Fed. 191; 83 Ala. 146; Smith, Con. (3d Am. ed.) 187. Interference with contract relations: 151 U. S. 13; 2 El. & Bl. 216; Bigelow, Torts (5th…
1Opinion of the Court
■Evans, J.
The Doctor Blosser Company, a corporation, brought an action against a number of printing concerns using the club or trade name of the “Employing Printers Club of Atlanta,” and composed of individuals, firms, and corporations engaged in the book and job-printing trade in the city of Atlanta, and whose names are set out in the record, asking an injunction and praying damages. The court granted the injunction, and exception is taken to this order. On the interlocutory hearing the defendants urged by demurrer the insufficiency of the facts pleaded to authorize the relief prayed.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Doremus v. HennessyIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Moran v. DunphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Haskins v. RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Luke v. DuPreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Cook v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Nasco, Inc. v. GimbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.