Louis Kamm, Inc. v. Flink
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
The judicial action here challenged is a judgment in favor of defendants, based upon an order striking out the complaint as sham.
We are confronted, in limine, with the question of whether the complaint is frivolous. It is in three counts. The gravamen of the first is that defendants (a) “wrongfully, maliciously and improperly induced and caused the Guarantee Building and Loan Association of the City of Newark (of which defendant Julius Flink was president) to drop and ignore plaintiff (who had procured a prospective purchaser of a theatrical…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Brackett v. . GriswoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Plant v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Beekman v. MarstersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Childress v. AbelesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Di Cristofaro v. Laurel Grove Memorial ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Akron-Canton Waste Oil, Inc. v. Safety-Kleen Oil Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.