Legal Opinion

United States v. Castillo

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided May 17, 1984No. NMCM 84 0486PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARR, Judge:

Appellant was tried by special court-martial, sitting as military judge alone, of one specification of larceny, in violation of Article 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 921. The specific nature of the offense alleged is the theft of dependent basic allowance for quarters/variable housing allowance (BAQ/VHA) monies during the period 13 March 1981 through 30 April 1982, total-ling $4369.24.1 Upon conviction, pursuant to a plea of guilty, appellant was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 60 days, reduction to pay grade E-l, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. SicleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  3. United States v. McFarlandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. TysonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1976

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. AntonelliUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. DeanU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. WatkinsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
  4. United States v. JohnsonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  5. United States v. AntonelliU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API