Department of Social & Health Services v. Mattson
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.
A parent has a right to a meaningful opportunity to be heard at a hearing to terminate parental rights. But that right is not self-executing. A parent must take reasonable and timely steps to exercise the right to be heard. Here, Robert Mattson failed to timely exercise his right to be heard in the termination hearing. And because balancing of the established due process factors in this case shows that Mattson’s parental interests were properly protected, we affirm.
M.S. and B.S are twin sisters born in March 1995. About a year later, they were placed in shelter care because their mother’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re the Welfare of SumeyWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re the Welfare of MyricksWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Darrow v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- State v. CriderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Welfare of L.R.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re the Welfare of S.I.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Department of Social & Health Services v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- In re Firestorm 1991Court of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Dependency Of K.l.d., 4/7/03, Dshs, Resp v. Ashley Todd, AppCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.