Legal Opinion

In re the Welfare of L.R.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 24, 2014No. Nos. 44595-6-II; 44598-1-IIPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaxa, J.

¶1 D.R. appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights as to two of her children, L.R. and A.H.1 She argues that the trial court violated her due process rights by proceeding with the first day of the termination trial even though she was not present. We hold that although conducting a termination hearing without the parent present raises due process concerns, the trial court did not violate D.R.’s due process rights under the facts of this case and in light of the procedural safeguards the trial court implemented.

¶2 D.R. also argues that the Department of Social and Health…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In Re Welfare of SegoWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. In Re Welfare of JMCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. In re the Welfare of J.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. M.D.T. v. C.A.M.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. Department of Social & Health Services v. DabbaghCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. In re Welfare of M.B.Washington Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Christopher James Burrows v. Alicia Ann De GonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. In Re Dependency Of: Z.f.s., Marie Smith v. DshsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API