Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Robertson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1970PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff recovered a personal injury judgment against defendant Robertson in the amount of $170,000 after defendant’s insurance company refused an offer to settle for $5,000, which was the policy limits of defendant’s liability insurance policy. Defendant being insolvent, plaintiff now attempts to collect his judgment by bringing a garnishment proceeding against defendant’s insurance company. He seeks to garnish “property” in the hands of the insurance company which belongs to insured, namely, the claim which defendant allegedly has against his insurance company for negligence and bad faith…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Ammerman Ex Rel. Ammerman v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Wessing v. American Indemnity Co. of Galveston, Tex.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1955
  5. Chittick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Scroggins v. Allstate Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  2. Gilley Ex Rel. Gilley v. FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Rutter v. KingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Bean v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API