Legal Opinion

Brown v. Candelora

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 1998No. 3013PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, President Judge:.

This Court has not previously addressed the issue presented by this appeal, specifically, whether a plaintiff who has recovered a judgment against an insured tortfeasor may, without obtaining an assignment from the *106insured, institute a garnishment action against the tortfeasor’s insurer based on claims of bad faith and breach of contract seeking sums in excess of the coverages provided by the terms of the policy. After a careful study of the arguments presented by the parties, we affirm the order entered by the distinguished Judge Norman Ackerman which directed the…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Gedeon v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Maertin v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  2. Sevast v. KakourasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Birth Center v. St. Paul Companies, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Dennis Haugh v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  5. Marks v. Nationwide Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API