Legal Opinion

Rutter v. King

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1974No. Docket 17881PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

This case raises the issue of first impression in Michigan of whether a successful judgment creditor plaintiff in a prior suit may proceed directly by garnishment against defendant’s insurer for the excess amount of the judgment over and above the policy limits. The trial court held not, and plaintiffs appeal. Subordinate questions of first impression are also included.

In 1972, plaintiff Pauline Rutter received a $30,-000 jury verdict for personal injuries sustained when an automobile driven by her husband, Richard Rutter, and in which she was riding as a passenger, was -struck by an…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Kranzush v. Badger State Mutual Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Commercial Union Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Brown v. CandeloraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Bean v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. Commercial Union Insurance v. Medical Protective Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API