Legal Opinion
Taylor v. United States Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 7, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1476PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Milton Joseph Taylor has filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, claiming principally that the United States Parole Commission does not have the authority to revoke his term of supervised release and sentence him to additional prison time. As this argument holds no water, the Court will deny the petition. 1
I. BACKGROUND
On June 14, 2002, in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, petitioner was convicted of distribution of heroin and sentenced to a five-year term of imprisonment followed by five years of supervised…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Queen v. MinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- In Re: BrooksCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Smallwood v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Foster v. WainwrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rahim v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Morrison v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- McCleod v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Bradley v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Abdul-Ali v. DyerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.