McCleod v. U.S. Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge
This matter has come before the Court on Craig McCleod’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus and the United State Parole Commission’s opposition. 1 On August 22, 2014, the Court issued an Order directing petitioner to file a reply to respondent’s opposition to his petition by September 22, 2014, an advising petitioner that the Court would treat respondent’s factual assertions as conceded if he did not file a timely reply. Because petitioner has not filed a reply, the Court treats respondent’s assertions of fact as conceded.
I…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fuller v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Robert Franklin v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Smallwood v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sweeney v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Carter v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Garnes v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Rosebar v. HoganDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Weems v. CushwaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021