Legal Opinion

Morrison v. U.S. Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 19, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1643PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, United States District Court

Pro se petitioner Johnnie Morrison (“Morrison”) seeks a Writ of Habeás Corpus or a Writ of Mandamus. 1 Morrison challenges the authority of defendants, U.S. Parole Commission (“Commission”) and D.C. Jail Warden (collectively “defendants”), over his supervised release and the legality of his conviction and sentence in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia, Case No.2005-FEL-007360. Morrison also seeks release from detainer in Prince George County, Maryland. For the following reasons, Morrison’s petition will be denied.

I.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Lane v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rahim v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Reed v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Floyd v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  4. Reed v. ThomasDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Reed v. WhitmerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API