Legal Opinion
Queen v. Miner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 25, 2008No. 08-1049PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Samuel Robert Queen, Jr. appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, dismissing his habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We will affirm the District Court’s order.
Queen’s habeas petition presented due process challenges and also challenged the finding that he was guilty of an institutional infraction for Possession, Manufacture, or Introduction of a Weapon, Code 104. See 28 C.F.R. § 541.13 (listing prohibited acts). The Respondent below noted that Queen had already raised the same claims,…
3Cases cited11 opinions
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Marcus Allan McIntosh v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Phillip B. Moscato 08126-050 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons L.S.C.I. Allenwood, Phillip B. MoscatoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by109 opinions
- Taylor v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Keith Collier v. R. MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Pachtinger v. GrondolskyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Jeffrey Holland v. Warden Canaan USPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
- Terrance Alden v. Warden AllenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.