Legal Opinion
Rahim v. U.S. Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 7, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1262PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge
While incarcerated for violating the conditions of his supervised release, Jamil Ra-him filed this pro se Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The potpourri of challenges he raises may be grouped into two distinct categories. First, he questions the authority of the United States Parole Commission to revoke his supervised release and denounces the procedures employed by the Commission in deeming him in violation. Second, he attacks his original sentencing, pointing to alleged defects in the trial court’s colloquy and his…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Swain v. PressleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fuller v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- David Isaiah Garris v. Charles S. Lindsay, Administrator, Maximum Security FacilityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hill v. SmootCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Richardson v. U.S. Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Brown v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Abdul-Ali v. DyerDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
- Carter v. United States Parole CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.