Legal Opinion

State v. Gaunce

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 8, 1992No. C8903-31631; CA A64170PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant petitions for review of our decision that affirmed, without opinion, his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. 110 Or App 372, 822 P2d 762. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15(1), and allow it. He contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that the police lawfully discovered contraband in his car during an inventory that followed his arrest. We vacate the judgment and remand for further proceedings.

In reviewing the trial court’s ruling, we are bound by its findings of historical fact that are supported by evidence in the record.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. CusterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. State v. LambertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API