Legal Opinion
State v. Custer
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 23, 1994No. 91P-3244; CA A74333PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, P. J.
Defendant appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled substance, unlawful possession of a destructive device and unlawful possession of a firearm. ORS 475.992 (4)(b); ORS 166.382(1)(b); ORS 166.250(1)(b). He claims that the trial court erred in refusing to suppress evidence seized during an inventory of the car that he was driving when he was arrested. We affirm the conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm and reverse and remand the other convictions.
The facts are undisputed. On June 25, 1991, Dallas police officer Wolfe saw defendant driving a car. Wolfe knew from previous…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WillhiteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bailey-Allen Co., Inc. v. KurzetCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- State v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. CusterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.