Whitaker v. Regents of the University of California
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On July 26, 1910, one Horace Whitaker executed a deed without money consideration to respondent herein of three hundred and twenty acres of forest land in Tulare County. The granting part was in the usual form of a deed absolute, but it was followed by this language: ‘1 This deed is expressly made subject to the following reservation hereinafter set forth, and upon the failure of said party to do and perform and carry out the purposes and intents for which the real property herein described is conveyed or in case of any violation of the reservations herein made, said property herein shall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Estate of LatourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Behlow v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1881
- Randol v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Barrie v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Batt v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Basin Oil Co. v. City of InglewoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Marlin v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Riedman v. BarkwillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- City of Palos Verdes Estates v. WillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.