Legal Opinion

Marlin v. Robinson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 9, 1932No. Docket No. 8186PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiffs filed suit to quiet title to a strip of land, alleging that they were the owners in fee, subject to an easement for road purposes only by defendant. Defendant answered, denying plaintiffs’ ownership and alleged that defendant was the owner in fee of the property and that plaintiffs had no right, title or interest or estate in the land except that acquired by user; namely, a right of way for road purposes over and along said strip of land. The trial court found in favor of plaintiffs, and defendant appealed.

John Goodrich was the owner of a piece or parcel of land…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Joerger v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Parks v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Cooper v. SeligCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Forgeus v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Las Posas Water Co. v. County of VenturaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Victory Oil Co. v. Hancock Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Mitchel v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Hay v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Kraemer v. KraemerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API