Legal Opinion

Basin Oil Co. v. City of Inglewood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1954No. Civ. 20145PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSK, J. pro tem. *

On November 15, 1909, appellants’ predecessors in interest executed and delivered a document to the respondent city of Inglewood providing in part as follows:

“That said undersigned first parties, in consideration of the sum of One Dollar to them in hand paid, the receipt of which is hereby confessed and acknowledged, and also in consideration of the benefits to be derived by said first parties from the acceptance by second party of this deed and of the land hereby offered for dedication as part of a public street, do hereby grant unto said second party those certain parcels…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Barnett v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Burnett v. PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Greene v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1892
  4. Kilpatrick v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1895
  5. Marshall v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. MacHado v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. City of Glendora v. FausCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Rio Vista Gas Assn. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Union Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API